Asian Journal of Research and Reports in Endocrinology

Are Family Dynamics and Psychosocial Support a Determinant of Glycaemic Control in Children with Diabetes Mellitus in Port Harcourt, Nigeria?

Iroro Yarhere *

Department of Paediatrics, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

Background: Diabetes control in children is usually predicted by availability of insulin, family dynamics, environmental stability and economic factors. Home or family dynamics can lead to psychosocial stress and affect the level of care provided for the child living with diabetes. This research studied family dynamics and as a determinant of glycaemic control in children living with diabetes mellitus.

Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study among sixty-three children and caregiver pairs at the Paediatrics department of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital between January to July 2022 for diabetes mellitus. The family dynamics and psychosocial supports were determined by a modified questionnaire. Glycaemic control was determined using the HbA1c done within the past 3 months. The mean HbA1c of the psychosocial variables was compared using student t-test/ANOVA. The associations between good control and the psychosocial factors were analysed using Pearson’s correlation test and logistic regression analyses, and p < 0.05 was set for statistical significance.

Results: Patients were aged 3 – 19 years, with mean age of 12.98 ± 3.97 years and a mean HbA1c of 11.13 ± 2.46%. The majority, 43 (67.4%) of children were living in two parents’ family settings Twenty-three (36.5%) were living in poor conditions with limited financial resources and 30 parents (47.6%) could not provide their parental functions adequately. The mean HbA1c for children living in 2 parent setting was 10.51  2.38%, as against 12.3  2.25% for those in single-parent/ nuclear settings, t = 2.71, p = 0.009. Good glycaemic control had weak positive correlations with caretaker type, satisfactory home environment and parental functioning.

Conclusion: Good glycaemic control is common with two-parent families and families with financial adequacy and a satisfactory home environment. Helping families cope with social and psychological stresses may help improve glycaemic control in children with diabetes.

Keywords: Family dynamics, social support, glycaemic control, home environment, Nigeria

---

---

---

References

DiMeglio LA, Acerini CL, Codner E et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(Suppl 27):105-114.

American DA. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:S180-S199.

White K, Kolman ML, Wexler P, Polin G, Winter RJ. Unstable diabetes and unstable families: A psychosocial evaluation of diabetic children with recurrent ketoacidosis. Pediatrics. 1984;73:749-755.

Fisher EB, Thorpe CT, Devellis BM, Devellis RF. Healthy coping, negative emotions, and diabetes management: A systematic review and appraisal. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33:1080-103; discussion 1104.

Mayberry LS, Osborn CY. Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1239-1245.

AlHaidar AM, AlShehri NA, AlHussaini MA. Family Support and Its Association with Glycemic Control in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020: 5151604.

Haugstvedt A, Wentzel-Larsen T, Rokne B, Graue M. Psychosocial family factors and glycemic control among children aged 1-15 years with type 1 diabetes: A population-based survey. BMC Pediatr. 2011; 11:118.

Kong A, Jones BL, Fiese BH et al. Parent-child mealtime interactions in racially/ethnically diverse families with preschool-age children. Eat Behav. 2013; 14:451-455.

Deeb A, Akle M, Al Ozairi A, Cameron F. Common Issues Seen in Paediatric Diabetes Clinics, Psychological Formulations, and Related Approaches to Management. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018: 1684175.

Ibadin MO, GO A. A revised scoring scheme for the classification of socio-economic status in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Paediatrics. 2021;48:26-33.

Osman HA, Elsadek N, Abdullah MA. Type 2 diabetes in Sudanese children and adolescents. Sudan J Paediatr. 2013;13: 17-23.

Dehayem MY, Takogue R, Choukem SP et al. Impact of a pioneer diabetes camp experience on glycemic control among children and adolescents living with type 1 diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Endocr Disord. 2016;16:5.

Ogugua CF, Chikani UN, Ibekwe MU, Ngwieri T, Allen H. Early signs of microvascular complications in pediatric patients with short duration of type 1 diabetes mellitus seen in southeast Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2019;18:200-205.

Pastakia SD, Nuche-Berenguer B, Pekny CR et al. Retrospective assessment of the quality of diabetes care in a rural diabetes clinic in Western Kenya. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018;18:97.

McClure Yauch L, Velazquez E, Piloya-Were T, Wainaina Mungai L, Omar A, Moran A. Continuous glucose monitoring assessment of metabolic control in east African children and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A pilot and feasibility study. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;3: e00135.

Elamin A, Altahir H, Ismail B, Tuvemo T. Clinical pattern of childhood type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in the Sudan. Diabetologia. 1992;35:645-648.

Lek N, Manivong A, Rassavong K, Phommachack D, Toomey C, Ng SM. Type 1 diabetes in Laos, 2016-2021. Pediatr Diabetes; 2022.

Ngwiri T, Were F, Predieri B, Ngugi P, Iughetti L. Glycemic Control in Kenyan Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:761759.

Thompson SJ, Auslander WF, White NH. Comparison of single-mother and two-parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:234-238.

Johnson G, Kent G, Leather J. Strengthening the parent-child relationship: A review of family interventions and their use in medical settings. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31:25-32.

Everett E, Mathioudakis NN. Association of socioeconomic status and DKA readmission in adults with type 1 diabetes: analysis of the US National Readmission Database. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019;7:e000621.

Ogle GD, Middlehurst AC, Silink M. The IDF Life for a Child Program Index of diabetes care for children and youth. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016;17:374-384.

Ogle GD, Kim H, Middlehurst AC, Silink M, Jenkins AJ. Financial costs for families of children with Type 1 diabetes in lower-income countries. Diabet Med. 2016;33: 820-826.

Danne T, Phillip M, Buckingham BA et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19 Suppl 27:115-135.

Priyambada L, Wolfsdorf JI, Brink SJ et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guideline: Diabetic ketoacidosis in the time of COVID-19 and resource-limited settings-role of subcutaneous insulin. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020;21:1394-1402.

Kalweit KL, Briers N, Olorunju S. The success of various management techniques used in South African children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. S Afr Med J. 2015;105:400-404.

Onyango JT, Namatovu JF, Besigye IK, Kaddumukasa M, Mbalinda SN. The relationship between perceived social support from family and diabetes self-management among patients in Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41:269.

Hanna KM. Existing measures of diabetes-specific support for use with adolescents with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32: 741-750.